Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Lassa Competus Winter 2+ gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ Budget-Reifen

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 4

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 1x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 4.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 4.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 4

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ Schwach

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ Schwach

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+

93%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

60%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 100%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 94%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 89%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage A

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+

76%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 65%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

2. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ ?

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 0%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ ?