Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 136

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 5x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Falken e.Ziex 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 3.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 6.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 4.8

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 2026

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

3. Falken e.Ziex 2025

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 95%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 84%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 70%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Falken e.Ziex 73%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 58%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 93%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 66%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk 2

61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 38%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 B

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?