Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Empfohlen

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 62%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

69%

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C