Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 97

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 4.33

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Sehr gut

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Gut

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Bedingt empfohlen

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 86%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 66%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ B

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

70%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 68%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+

69%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 69%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ C