Vergleich: Hankook ION Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Hankook ION Evo Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Hankook ION Evo 64

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Hankook ION Evo 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Hankook ION Evo 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Hankook ION Evo 82%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 63%

2. Hankook ION Evo 60%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Hankook ION Evo 69%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Hankook ION Evo B

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

63%

1. Hankook ION Evo 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Hankook ION Evo ?

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%