Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. Nokian WetProof Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 225

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Nokian WetProof 14x

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 12x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

4. Nokian WetProof 17.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Nokian WetProof 5.64

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.25

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Beispielhaft

2. Nokian WetProof Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

1. Nokian WetProof Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Gut

Nokian
WetProof

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

72%

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

2. Nokian WetProof 72%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Nokian WetProof 81%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Nokian WetProof 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Nokian WetProof 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 89%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Nokian
WetProof

76%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

76%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. Nokian WetProof 80%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 78%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 82%

3. Nokian WetProof 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Nokian WetProof 63%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Nokian
WetProof

75%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

63%

1. Nokian WetProof 86%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 65%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Nokian WetProof 69%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 51%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Nokian WetProof 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 74%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

68%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Nokian WetProof 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Nokian WetProof 56%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 B

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?