Vergleich: Nokian WetProof gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Nokian WetProof Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Nokian WetProof 47

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

2. Nokian WetProof 14x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Nokian WetProof 5.64

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

4. Nokian WetProof 2023

1. Nokian WetProof Sehr empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

1. Nokian WetProof Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

Nokian
WetProof

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76.7%

Falken
e.Ziex

74.5%

1. Nokian WetProof A

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Nokian
WetProof

97%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

75.3%

Nokian
WetProof

97%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

69.9%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

45%

1. Nokian WetProof ?

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

82.9%

Falken
e.Ziex

80%

Nokian
WetProof

58%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

32%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Nokian WetProof C

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?