Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental AllSeasonContact 2

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Premium

3. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 284

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

3. Viking Fourtech 32

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 17x

3. Viking Fourtech 5x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 1.

3. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 7.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 2.47

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

81%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 82%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Viking Fourtech 59%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 73%

1. Viking Fourtech 77%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 75%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 85%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

3. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 88%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

3. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B

3. Viking Fourtech ?

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

83%

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

?

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 92%

2. Viking Fourtech 67%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 84%

2. Viking Fourtech 71%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 77%

2. Viking Fourtech 51%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

1. Viking Fourtech 82%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 81%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

93%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

68%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 73%

3. Viking Fourtech 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 55%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 76%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B

3. Viking Fourtech ?

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 85%

2. Viking Fourtech 76%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 82%

3. Viking Fourtech 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ?

3. Viking Fourtech ?

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

76%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 76%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 77%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Viking Fourtech 71%