Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Falken e.Ziex 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Michelin e.Primacy 12

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

4. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

1. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Michelin
e.Primacy

62%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Falken e.Ziex 68%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Falken e.Ziex 77%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Falken e.Ziex 81%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 85%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 73%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin
e.Primacy

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 54%

1. Falken e.Ziex ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Michelin
e.Primacy

89%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. BFGoodrich Advantage C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?