Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Michelin e.Primacy 111

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 59

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Continental UltraContact NXT 2x

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 1x

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 12.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

5. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 12

5. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Continental UltraContact NXT 2025

2. Falken e.Ziex 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

4. Continental UltraContact NXT Testsieger

5. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

64%

Michelin
e.Primacy

59%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

46%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 74%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 51%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 1%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Continental UltraContact NXT 68%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 61%

5. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Falken e.Ziex 69%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 50%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 45%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 65%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Michelin e.Primacy B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 C

5. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

74%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

42%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 54%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 42%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Falken e.Ziex ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 ?

5. Continental UltraContact NXT ?

Firestone
Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Falken
e.Ziex

84.9%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

75.3%

Michelin
e.Primacy

74.4%

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

Continental
UltraContact NXT

87.5%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Firestone
Multihawk 2

74%

Falken
e.Ziex

60%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. Firestone Multihawk 2 72%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

5. Continental UltraContact NXT 0%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Continental UltraContact NXT A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

4. Firestone Multihawk 2 E

5. Falken e.Ziex ?