Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

4. Firestone Multihawk Obere-Mittelklasse

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

4. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

5. Firestone Multihawk 0x

1. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

5. Firestone Multihawk 0.

1. Michelin e.Primacy 12

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

5. Firestone Multihawk 0

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Firestone Multihawk 2014

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Testsieger

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

5. Firestone Multihawk ?

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Gut

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

5. Firestone Multihawk ?