Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

4. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 100%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

3. Falken e.Ziex 73%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

81%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 65%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Firestone Roadhawk ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 60%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?