Vergleich: Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin e.Primacy 111

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 91

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 6.

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 10.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

4. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 8

4. Michelin e.Primacy 12

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 2026

2. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

2. Michelin e.Primacy Sehr gut

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

4. Michelin e.Primacy Ausreichend

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

72%

Michelin
e.Primacy

61%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 86%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 65%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 74%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 62%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 52%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

4. Michelin e.Primacy B

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin
e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 69%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 63%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 80%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 71%

1. Michelin e.Primacy 93%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

3. Nokian Powerproof 2 42%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin
e.Primacy

67%

1. Nokian Powerproof 2 84%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. Michelin e.Primacy 67%

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Nokian Powerproof 2 B

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin
e.Primacy

70%

Nokian
Powerproof 2

66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

3. Michelin e.Primacy ?

4. Nokian Powerproof 2 ?